sorry, i did realise. i'm afraid i just couldn't resist slightly
misquoting Flanders and Swann's `Song of Reproduction' (High Fidelity).
http://www.amazon.com/Complete-Flanders-Swann-Georges-Brassens/dp/B000006T4S/ref=pd_sim_b_1
--- Begin Message ---
Charles Forsyth wrote:
>> Hardware 24...@192khz.
>
> the human ear can't hear as high as that
> still, it ought to please any passing bat!
> Hi-fi, hi-fi, ...
So if i instead said 24...@44.1khz would it make any difference on my
argument? please.
You are right, however 192kHz means the DAC bandwidth could support 4x
48kHz buffers, which is what it's used for.
--- End Message ---
