> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 09:26, erik quanstrom<quans...@quanstro.net> wrote: > > i don't know > > what versions of fat 2e supported, but i would imagine restricting > > oneself to fat16 (and not fat16 lba) would be safest. > > i used fat16, i think lba. i figured plan 9 would be smart enough to > deal with lba and large disks, but wikipedia tells me that 1995 was > sort of a chs-lba transition period, so perhaps i was wrong. i won't > be able to experiment with chs on the laptop as it has a large disk > with freebsd filling it except for the very end
even the current 9load won't deal with fat16 lba or fat32 lba. 9load-e820 does, though. - erik
