-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ethan Grammatikidis wrote: > I just don't like parsing a for statement, it's rarely clear and usually ugly > to my eyes.
Writing a parser to parse a for statement is slightly more involved as well. However I was commenting on how the compiler seems to handle a do/while properly so it might be possible to get for- and while-loops to avoid reporting the false warning with some effort. I still use for(;;) instead of while(1) ever since I saw compilers emit machine code that moved $1 into a register followed by a compare. Most modern compilers do no do this anymore but old habits die hard. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkqB7csACgkQl3JZTBu3/9lgjACgsrd39mxz4Ak6x9cY4iUeK0+A gnUAnRwbVd/6nkxLW5dtxeoxJnS+Njf/ =Rkj5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
