On Mon Jun 1 16:48:00 EDT 2009, st...@quintile.net wrote: > > by the way, why h and not H? > > yep, you are right, I was too hasty in my email. >
but h would work, but only if there is no sender. for example, if you had a multipart that's not a message/rfc-822. if it weren't for the quirks, i think ned might disappear. - erik
