On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 18:53 +0100, roger peppe wrote: > i wonder how many things would break if plan 9 moved to > a strictly name-based mapping for its mount table...
What exactly do you mean by *strictly* ? Thanks, Roman.
On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 18:53 +0100, roger peppe wrote: > i wonder how many things would break if plan 9 moved to > a strictly name-based mapping for its mount table...
What exactly do you mean by *strictly* ? Thanks, Roman.