Seconded - I vote for a movement until 1Q10, I think you'll get a lot
more industry participation this way.
-eric
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 9:28 AM, Latchesar Ionkov <lu...@ionkov.net> wrote:
> There were some ideas of skipping this year and making the next IWP9
> in the beginning of the next year. End of the year is a difficult time
> for travel, the budgets for travel are depleted, or not if the fiscal
> year starts earlier than the calendar one, not defined well enough.
>
> Lucho
>
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 7:54 AM, Devon H. O'Dell <devon.od...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> Hello!
>>
>> Although I probably won't be able to go unless it's close (a.k.a. in
>> the Baltimore / Washington DC area -- which actually isn't perhaps a
>> bad idea?), the subject of an IWP9 has been brought up several times
>> this year. I'd like to get the ball rolling on this, in case anybody
>> is interested in setting it up or attending. I think the question at
>> this point is, ``Who wants to organize it, and who will attend?''
>>
>> I'm perfectly fine to organize the event, and I'm sure my office could
>> more than accommodate any interested attendees. Just kind of curious
>> what timeframes people would be interested in, and whether people
>> would be able / willing to come. If not, some discussion on the when
>> and where might not be a bad idea, anyway. Let me know!
>>
>> --Devon
>>
>>
>
>
