> i'm speculating on the design of the auth system.  i wasn't
> there so i could be wrong.  but in order to have a terminal
> that many people could log into would require either
> (a) killing off the original factotum on logout and changing
> eve back to bootes or something.  and beware the 1001 places
> that stash eve somewhere.

I wasn't there either, but I do have some fuzzy
memories of running 2nd edition.  Factotum came
along later than that.  It may have been new with
4th edition.

The general impression I always got was two-fold.
>From a philosophical point of view, whoever is logged
into a terminal is the owner of the hardware.  After
all, physical access is the ultimate privilege.  So if
you just don't bother creating a logout mechanism,
then the only time the hardware doesn't have an
owner is from reset to authenticating a user.  The
practical side means that a lot gets simpler and a
number of concerns go away.  If the system reboots
between users, there's nothing of the first user left
on the terminal when the second user comes along.
I don't have to be careful to clean up all the processes,
etc left behind; rebooting does that.  The old login
trojan horses also go away. ^t^tr is grabbed by the
kernel and we reboot.  It seemed a little strange to
me at first, but the more I worked with the system,
the more logical it seemed.

BLS


Reply via email to