> doesn't the kernel get credit either way? either > it's the source (devmnt) or the server (devcons). > am i missing something?
if devmnt is involved, devcons is not. it is some 9P server mounted on /dev/cons, not the kernel's devcons. russ
> doesn't the kernel get credit either way? either > it's the source (devmnt) or the server (devcons). > am i missing something?
if devmnt is involved, devcons is not. it is some 9P server mounted on /dev/cons, not the kernel's devcons. russ