On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 6:34 AM, erik quanstrom <quans...@quanstro.net> wrote: > On Tue Mar 24 08:54:12 EDT 2009, rogpe...@gmail.com wrote: >> http://www.classhat.com/tymaPaulMultithread.pdf > > seems more like grist for the task vs. process > debate. not that the outcome is in doubt.
except that they only went to 1000 threads. Once we hit more than that, linux fell over badly for us on even a big machine. I guess the java threads are much better than posix threads? I don't know. I just know that we've had to go back to AIO instead of a posix threads-based tool. ron
