> The problem is that when sleep is a little bit too fast on every round,
> t will never catch up with ct. so it sleeps shorter and shorter until
> t - ct < 1.
> 
> It all works when changing t += msec to t = ct + msec. It may still
> do a zero sleep, but the error will not add up.

why not just get rid of the double?  then you will never zero sleep.

- erik

Reply via email to