that seems a little awkward. erik's suggestion is what i
think i'd really like. rog's would be okay, although still
somewhatawkward, were i on plan 9; since i'm not, i think
i have russ's option. so with -x, say i had a tree:

/dog
/cat
/fish/guppie
/fish/clown
/pig

and i wanted /dog, /cat, and /fish/clown. would three
includes be sufficent there, or do i need it include /fish and
then exclude /fish/guppie, to get the heirarchy?

i do wish more tools used proto. the format is so nice.

Reply via email to