Correct. Please ... no speculative posts - blokes. Test it first. If that isn't obvious please go to slashdot and contribute to the open sewer, the consensus of the ill-informed.
brucee On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 12:34 AM, erik quanstrom <quans...@quanstro.net> wrote: > On Fri Feb 13 08:32:56 EST 2009, pavel.klinkov...@gmail.com wrote: >> Alternatively, if '9fs' would 'mkdir' automatically, the sequence >> would be: >> - 9fs (automatic 'mkdir' and 'mount') >> - ...usage... >> - user 'unmounts' the fs... >> - ...and the directory is still present... :-( > > actually, the more likely result would be "permission denied". > you'd need to mount ramfs on /n to do it this way. > > - erik > >