Correct. Please ... no speculative posts - blokes. Test it first. If
that isn't obvious please go to slashdot and contribute to the open
sewer, the consensus of the ill-informed.

brucee

On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 12:34 AM, erik quanstrom <quans...@quanstro.net> wrote:
> On Fri Feb 13 08:32:56 EST 2009, pavel.klinkov...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Alternatively, if '9fs' would 'mkdir' automatically, the sequence
>> would be:
>> - 9fs (automatic 'mkdir' and 'mount')
>> - ...usage...
>> - user 'unmounts' the fs...
>> - ...and the directory is still present... :-(
>
> actually, the more likely result would be "permission denied".
> you'd need to mount ramfs on /n to do it this way.
>
> - erik
>
>

Reply via email to