> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 04:32:18PM -0500, erik quanstrom wrote: > > i'm still not following why replica won't work? getting in underneath > > the fs seems to require some extra justification and it seems to require > > some very low-level modifications. and yet the file interface provides > > what i think one would need for such a project. what is wrong with > > replica that can't be reasonably fixed? > > I wish to enable mirrors of sourcesdump as well. Replica would do lots of > extra work and transfer, vs. venti/copy -f, yes?
what extra work would that be, and if there is extra work, could you explain why this would be a problem? - erik