> As I naively see it, the two main problems are: > 1) to have 9vx running a cpu server kernel instead of a stand alone > terminal one (I don't even know if that's the case actually).
i think there would be a little work in getting this going. > 2) to have the host forwarding whatever packets should go to 9vx. is this enough? http://9fans.net/archive/2008/12/501 http://9fans.net/archive/2008/12/505 - erik
