> I agree that it would be nice if the exceptions were > documented in the man page. They are quite nicely > documented in the code, though:
That's easy enough to do, I'm sure. I'll look into that and see if I can build the confidence for a patch to, I presume, rfork(2)? The rationale is also at least to a large extent in the quoted comments, congratulations to the implementor. Is there a nice practical example one can use in the man page too? That would be very helpful in understanding the value and possibly the limitations of RFNOMNT. ++L
