On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 11:49 AM, Roman Shaposhnik <r...@sun.com> wrote:

> Two questions:
>   1. But before I ask this one: I don't deny that per-file append-only
>    is *extremely* useful. My question is a different one: what is
>    the danger of N clients accesing the file X in append-only mode
>    and M clients accesing it in random access mode? Could you,
>    please, give a concrete scenario?

there are no problems if you don't care about the integrity of the data.

ron

Reply via email to