On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 6:55 AM, matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've tried a couple of times to map files / directories on to SQL and it is > not a great match imho. > > I wrote a Limbo module that handles the postgresql protocol and frankly > that's as far as I thought it should be taken, writes are one time use and > any returned qureries are (potentially) outdated by the time the client gets > them. Any FS would end up as a read only cache with somewhere to send sql > writes and a load of logic that repeats what's on the SQL server already. > > I split my system into two - one to deal with the SQL and one that makes a > FS tree from columnated data. Though I abandoned dev on the tree because I > just ended up accessing the data through the Limbo pg module directly.
How was the data more outdated than when you used pg directly? -- Tom Lieber http://AllTom.com/
