On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 4:54 AM, Eric Van Hensbergen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have two measurements of success: > a) what keeps me working on Plan 9 related technologies in a paid position > b) what switches people from using NFS, GPFS, or other horribly > complicated solutions to something closer to Plan 9
Fair enough. Does .L still qualify as "closer to Plan 9", or is it NFS by any other name? Please excuse the inflammatory phrasing - that's an honest question. I'm very ignorant about NFS and its differences from 9p, other than the number of message types. If you have a moment I'd appreciate a quick summary, but feel free to tell me to do my own homework ;) I'd hazard a guess that 9p's auth mechanism is more flexible, for starters. -sqweek
