* Anant Narayanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I must say that it is highly unlikely that Mozilla will adopt the path  
> of splitting the "monolithic app into a bunch of fileservers" simply  
> because that would involve a lot work, and potentially a lot code to  
> be written from scratch.

Well, let's see. I'll try to use the current discussions to push 9P in. 
Mozilla folks aren't very open to innovation (no matter how old/mature 
this innovation already is), but at least I've still got some hope ;)

Of course this will take a while, but it can be done. 
(give me, lets say, 10 good devs for about half a year, and I'll 
show you ;-P)

I don't want a completely modularized / splitted Mozilla (not yet),
moving out things like web access (-> webfs), profile handling (so many 
separate instances can run simultaniously), plugins (webfs, rio, ...)
would alreay be a HUGE advantage.

Everyone of you can help by just advocating 9P and demonstrating
what it can do :)


cu
-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Enrico Weigelt, metux IT service -- http://www.metux.de/

 cellphone: +49 174 7066481   email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]   skype: nekrad666
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Embedded-Linux / Portierung / Opensource-QM / Verteilte Systeme
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to