> The "global" plan9 one (sda1) seem to be the same in both cases, as well > as the other sda* ones (linux), but the subpartitions (not sure they're > called that way) inside differ. > I suppose the correct one is the plan9 one, i.e 9fat should start at the > beginning of the plan9 one (at 63), and not at 0, right? Hence the reason > why everything has an offset of 63 inside the plan9 part, I guess. > > So, what should I do? Is it a bug in 9vx, or is it something wrong in my > partitions that I have to correct?
Notice that you've lost your data partition and you don't have a geometry line. That suggests you are running 0.12, which does not contain Erik's bug fix. If you rebuild 9vx from hg I think things will work better. Russ
