I have always felt guilty about wanting Common LISP on Plan 9; but I am not entirely sure why. John
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 4:35 PM, David Leimbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> The question is what new function Plan 9, as an OS, defines for >> the end user. >> Plan 9 is not for end users. Plan 9 is for programmers. > > I think I just heard the sound of a nail being struck on the head. > > I do find myself wanting Lisp, Scheme, and Haskell and all my other weird > programming toys for Plan 9 too. I believe Haskell and Scheme are handled, > but has there ever been a Common Lisp implementation for it? Perhaps I > should look into a port of SBCL or something. > Dave >> >> -rob >> > >
