On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 1:43 AM, Nyang A. Phra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Poking around Plan 9 and 9P, I was wondering whether it would be a
> neat hack or some sort of abuse to read and write dynamically served
> files at different offsets to get different semantics, instead of
> reading and writing different files (ctl, clone, etc.) to do that.

it's a step backwards in time to very old ideas. And it's a terrible
idea. Heed your spider sense.

Just consider the QID  as your differentiator.

ron

Reply via email to