Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-6lo-multicast-registration-18: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6lo-multicast-registration/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you to Dan Romascanu for the GENART review. ** Use of draft-kuehlewind-rswg-updates-tag language. The document goes to the trouble of using this nuanced approach to the update tag, but then inconsistently applies. For example: -- Section 4 and 6 are titled “Updating …” and later in the body of the text use the amends/extends from draft-kuehlewind-rswg-updates-tag to more precisely described the document relationship. However, Section 5 uses a tag type from draft-kuehlewind-rswg-updates-tag directly in the title with “Extends …”. -- Section 8 doesn’t seem to use either amends or extend to explain how the “Updating …” is occurring. ** Section 10. Editorial. Why are the field descriptions not consistent with the order in which they appear (i.e., why is exponent and mantissa at the end?)? _______________________________________________ 6lo mailing list 6lo@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
