Dear Roman Danyliw. Thanks for your valuable comments.
Based on your comments, I updated the text in section 2.5 but I missed it in the table in section 2.7. I agree with your point and I think it should be updated from "health-care services" to "secure transfer". Secure transfer includes payment and health-care service, etc. I will update the draft and re-submit. Best regards. Yong-Geun. 2023년 3월 16일 (목) 오전 8:17, Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org>님이 작성: > Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-6lo-use-cases-15: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to > https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ > for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6lo-use-cases/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Thank you to Robert Sparks for the SECDIR review. > > Thanks for addressing my DISCUSS and my substantive COMMENTs. > > == > > ** Section 2.7 > > The following table shows the dominant parameters of each > use case corresponding to the 6lo link layer technology. > > Is NFC “dominantly” only used in “health-care services”? Is there a basis > for that assertion. > > > >
_______________________________________________ 6lo mailing list 6lo@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
