Hi Luigi, Thanks for your message.
In IETF 115 (London) there were 25 minutes allocated to PASA (main document plus reliability document). And that time turned out to be a bit short. Would you have an estimate about how much time would you need at IETF 116? Also, would you present the main document or do you plan to present also the companion reliability document? (Note that these questions are just in case you know the answers as early as "today"... There is no actual need to know the answers so early, however the WG session request deadline is a bit too early... We understand that your plans might change between today and when we do the actual "official" call for agenda items... But any known info will help better planning the 6lo session request.) Thanks, Shwetha and Carles Missatge de Luigi IANNONE <luigi.iann...@huawei.com> del dia dt., 31 de gen. 2023 a les 9:00: > Hi Carles and Shwetha, > > > > I can do an update on the PASA document. Since 115 we changed a few things. > > I did list the changes in an email but a presentation can help in better > explain the changes. > > > > Ciao > > > > L. > > > > > > *From:* 6lo <6lo-boun...@ietf.org> *On Behalf Of *Carles Gomez Montenegro > *Sent:* Wednesday, 25 January 2023 14:56 > *To:* 6lo@ietf.org > *Subject:* [6lo] 6lo session at IETF 116 (Yokohama) > > > > Dear WG, > > We (6lo chairs) are currently in the process of deciding the duration of > the slot to be requested for the 6lo session at IETF 116 (Yokohama). > > If you have topics you would like to present and discuss in the 6lo > session at IETF 116, please let us know no later than 6th of February 23:59 > (UTC) to help us plan the next session. > > Thanks, > > Shwetha and Carles >
_______________________________________________ 6lo mailing list 6lo@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
