Dear Robert Sparks. Thanks for your valuable reviews and comments.
For your last comment regarding Section 3, I will update the sentence in a next revision to provide concrete meaning. Best regards. Yong-Geun. 2022년 11월 18일 (금) 오전 1:36, Robert Sparks via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org>님이 작성: > Reviewer: Robert Sparks > Review result: Ready > > I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing > effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These > comments > were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. > Document > editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other > review > comments. > > This document is ready for publication as an Informational RFC > > Thanks for addressing my Last Call comments. The new Security > Considerations > text is helpful (though I would have preferred even more). > > I'll point to one last potential problem spot (as a nit) that you may wish > to > reconsider. See Section 3 at: > > "Encryption is important if the implementation can afford it." > > >From the rest of the document, it's clear that Encryption is important > even if > the implementation _can't_ afford it (and what does "afford it" even mean > in > this context)? > > Please try to find more specific text to convey what you are trying to say. > > >
_______________________________________________ 6lo mailing list 6lo@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
