Hi all,
I did not recognize blemesh for what it is.
This document is interesting because BT in general has a large
industrial support.
It is very important that this document is written in collaboration with
the BT sig.
Learning that this is indeed the case, I support the adoption of this
document fully.
Peter
Yong-Geun Hong schreef op 2016-10-06 04:21:
Hello All..
I support the adoption of this document.
We can use existing network topology of each 6lo link layer
technologies but it is more better to explore network topology.
In the 6lo-blemeth document, it enables IPv6 over BLE networks of a
more complex topology than just the typical BLE star topology.
I think that this kind of topology can enhance IoT services and use
cases.
Best regards.
YongGeun.
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 2:48 AM, samita Chakrabarti
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hello All:
We have discussed 6lo-blemesh at the IETF 96 6lo meeting and there
were interests in the WG to work on this draft.
The draft authors also have been requested to check with BTSIG and
BTSIG has been consulted.
We would like to proceed with the WG adoption call for this
document:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gomez-6lo-blemesh/ [1]
Please provide your opinion on the mailing list with ‘Yes/No’
and a short note.
The adoption call ends on October 7, 2016.
Thanks,
Gabriel & Samita
6lo-chairs
_______________________________________________
6lo mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo [2]
Links:
------
[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gomez-6lo-blemesh/
[2] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
_______________________________________________
6lo mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
_______________________________________________
6lo mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
